What is the power of the monstrous? Where does it get this power? Jacques Derrida, who in his early work associated the future as such with a certain monstrosity (cf Derrida’s preface to Of Grammatology), said in an interview: A monster may be obviously a composite figure of heterogenous organisms that are grafted onto each [...]
Archive for the ‘Brain’ Category
And
Posted: April 9, 2012 in Becoming, Brain, capitalism, Clinamen, Deleuze, Diagramming Affective Ethics, Ecology of Sensation, Method, Perception, Precarity, self-organizing, Swarms, ValueTags: affect, assemblage, Becoming, Bergson, body, Deleuze, Ecology of Sensation, intensity, multiplicity, ontology, resonance
The Affect of Precarity
Posted: October 30, 2011 in biopower, Brain, Deleuze, Diagramming Affective Ethics, Ecology of Sensation, Foucault, marketing, marketing ethics, Perception, Precarity, Time, value captureTags: affect, biopower, body, control, Deleuze, duration, Foucault, ontology, temporality
We insist on one thing. Duration. And the diagram. And affect. Ok that’s already quite a crowd, well but isn’t there an entire method in these three vector-concepts: duration, diagram, affect? What is the duration of a habit, say the habit of smoking or the habit of playing a guitar? Remember what Toscano teaches us [...]
Are you with the Occupation?
Posted: October 16, 2011 in Becoming, biopower, Brain, capitalism, Chaplin, Clinamen, Diagramming Affective Ethics, Ecology of Sensation, ethics, marketing ethics, Method, Neuroscience, New Media, Organized Networks, Perception, Precarity, Time, Value, value added, value captureTags: affect, assemblage, Becoming, body, Deleuze, difference, habit, intensity, ontology
What is the nature of a connection? I have been influenced by Franco Berardi (Bifo) recently. He points out that definitions have to be approached through multiple strategies because what is important is shocking thought by the reconstitution of a virtual field of sense and sensation. In other words, part of what is at stake [...]
Arco Madrid
Posted: February 19, 2009 in Brain, capitalism, ethics, marketing, ValueTags: affect, Bergson, Deleuze, New Media, value added
It was my first, and I hope not last, visit to ARCO, an international arts market. It was interesting, if only because of the anxiety of being a part of an institutional machinery for assigning an exchange value to what should have no fixed exchange or use value. The discursive context fed into my project [...]
On Bergson’s Pure Duration and Suzuki’s Sunyata-Tathata
Posted: June 28, 2008 in Bergson, Brain, Causality, Deleuze, Ecology of Sensation, Freedom, Method, Nietzsche, Perception, Representation, Succession, Time, ZenTags: affect, Bergson, duration, intensity, Suzuki, temporality, Zen
Bergson writes in Time and Free Will: “To say that the same inner causes will reproduce the same effects is to assume that the same cause can appear a second time on the stage of consciousness. Now, if duration is what we say, deep seated psychic states are radically heterogeneous to each other, and it is impossible that any two of them [...]
Deleuze, Cinema, and Zen: Break the Motor
Posted: May 27, 2008 in Becoming, Brain, Chaplin, Cinema, Deleuze, Ecology of Sensation, Method, Perception, TimeWhat do we know of Deleuze’s Zen? We know of the passages in Logic of Sense, those passages where Zen practice and more specifically the koan (a puzzle without an answer) make a momentary appearance. We know of the image of thought that Zen gave Deleuze, something intolerable: teach with a blow of the staff. [...]