We insist on one thing. Duration. And the diagram. And affect. Ok that’s already quite a crowd, well but isn’t there an entire method in these three vector-concepts: duration, diagram, affect? What is the duration of a habit, say the habit of smoking or the habit of playing a guitar? Remember what Toscano teaches us [...]
Archive for the ‘marketing’ Category
The Affect of Precarity
Posted: October 30, 2011 in biopower, Brain, Deleuze, Diagramming Affective Ethics, Ecology of Sensation, Foucault, marketing, marketing ethics, Perception, Precarity, Time, value captureTags: affect, biopower, body, control, Deleuze, duration, Foucault, ontology, temporality
Digital Marketing as Generalized Snooping: On Virilio’s Information Bomb
Posted: November 28, 2010 in biopower, capitalism, Diagramming Affective Ethics, Ecology of Sensation, marketingTags: affect, assemblage, attention, biopower, body, cell phones, habit, information, New Media, ontology, panopticism, Reality Mining, Virilio
Let’s begin with some examples that will update aspects of Virilio’s argument in The Information Bomb. 1. “The Reality Mining Dataset: The Reality Mining project represents the largest mobile phone experiment ever attempted in academia. We are collecting an unprecedented amount of data on human behavior and group interactions that we plan on anonymizing and [...]
Deleuze and Foucault on Marketing as Control
Posted: November 2, 2010 in Deleuze, marketingTags: affect, Amit S. Rai, assemblage, biopower, Foucault, habit, intensity, New Media, ontology, technology, value added
Gilles Deleuze never to my knowledge wrote extensively on marketing, but he had some choice words for it in “Postscript on Societies of Control.” I quote them below. I lectured today, minutes ago actually, on Foucault’s panopticism and Deleuze’s modulated control to my first year marketing and communication course at QMUL. I tried to make [...]
What is Marketing Ethics, Part Two
Posted: October 23, 2010 in biopower, Diagramming Affective Ethics, marketing, marketing ethicsTags: affect, Amit S. Rai, assemblage, biopower, body, business ethics, control, creativity, Deleuze, Foucault, habit, ontology, value added
In Chapter Three of Levy and Grewal’s Marketing they make the case for ethics explicitly (not just through stop-hand warnings!): “When customers believe that they can no longer trust a company or that the company is not acting responsibly, they will no longer support that company by purchasing its products or services or investing in [...]
What is ‘Marketing Ethics’?
Posted: September 20, 2010 in Becoming, biopower, capitalism, Ecology of Sensation, ethics, marketing, marketing ethics, Method, NietzscheWhat is the relationship of ethics to marketing (and capitalism more generally)? This opens on to other questions, as I’m fond of saying. Such as where is the social in marketing? Where does the social appear in marketing analysis and textbooks? As I noted in Biopower and Marketing in Grewal and Levy’s marketing textbook, the [...]
Arco Madrid
Posted: February 19, 2009 in Brain, capitalism, ethics, marketing, ValueTags: affect, Bergson, Deleuze, New Media, value added
It was my first, and I hope not last, visit to ARCO, an international arts market. It was interesting, if only because of the anxiety of being a part of an institutional machinery for assigning an exchange value to what should have no fixed exchange or use value. The discursive context fed into my project [...]